Its collective and for-all-time aspects put more restrictions on land use and resource development
Vancouver Sun
VICTORIA — When the Supreme Court of Canada granted recognition of aboriginal title recently, the landmark decision emphasized the similarity as well as the critical difference to other forms of land ownership. “Aboriginal title confers ownership rights similar to those associated with fee simple,” wrote the high court, citing the common form of private property. “The right to decide how the land will be used; the right of enjoyment and occupancy of the land; the right to possess the land; the right to the economic benefits of the land; and the right to pro-actively use and manage the land.” But there’s a “carve out” as the court put it, drawing on its own and earlier jurisprudence: “The uses must be consistent with the group nature of the interest and the enjoyment of the land by future generations.”
Related Post
October 26, 2023
Province increases funding for community forest wildfire risk reduction
News Release We are pleased to announce that the
February 15, 2023
BC introduces new measures on old growth, innovation, forest stewardship
New announcement on process and funding for policy reforms